Tuesday, January 14, 2020

A great American hero? ~ July 16, 1987



David Heiller

National politics usually has no place in a weekly editor’s repertoire, but the past week of testimony from Oliver North before a Congressional committee in Washington offers a good reason.
Excuse me while I rant and rave. Oliver North is not a hero to me, despite the telegrams stacked in front of him and his glittering uniform. Despite his “telegenic” personality, his erect back and direct stares, despite his sincerity and tenacity, I don’t think he will stay an American hero for long, if at all.
A friend of mine perhaps said it best Monday at lunch: “If people think Oliver North is a hero, they’d better take a refresher course in civics.”
North’s actions, and the actions of the covert operation he belonged to, challenge our government just two months before the 200th anniversary of our Constitution. The Constitution, to refresh a few memories, is the document that set up our framework of government, dividing it into the executive, congressional, and judicial branch. It also added a Bill of Rights, 10 amendments that needed to be added to keep people believing in that government. First on the list: freedom of the press, freedom of speech.
The people who worked out the Constitution knew what life was like without freedom of expression, and they knew that an active press kept elected officials accountable. They knew that the system of checks and balances between Congress and the President would accomplish the same thing.
Oliver North stated time and again, with seeming pride, that he lied to Congress, to keep them from knowing the truth. He stated that he did not trust them, that they would leak information to the press, whom he did not trust either.
He did this to follow orders, he says, but he did this because it is something he believes in with such fervor. He didn’t like the Congressional stand on Nicaragua, so he worked to change it, secretly, and against the laws of our Constitution, our nation. His way reflects the Reagan administration’s way of dealing with Nicaragua and elsewhere. It’s as good of an example of any as to why people in Nicaragua, and increasingly people around the world, are losing respect for our government. With double standards such as selling arms to terrorists, taking the money and secretly passing it on to the supporters of an overthrown dictator, and keeping the profits for personal use and future secret operations, who wouldn’t support the Sandinistas? Who wouldn’t lose faith in the current administration?
Heroes. We’ve all had them, and still do. Mine was Micky Mantle when I was a kid. He hit home runs and looked at you squarely from the Wheaties package. As we grow older, we look for other qualities to respect. Everybody has a person or two that they admire for their integrity, for their character, for their honesty. Parents try to raise their children with those qualities.
I hope my two children do not grow up to be like Oliver North. I want them to have convictions, but I want those convictions to follow our laws and government. If they do not, I want them to work openly to change them. I want them to follow orders, but not without asking why.
And I hope they live in a country that can separate a hero from a hoax.
Editor's note: A few weeks later David received this letter from our Congressman, James L. Oberstar:
Mr. David Heiller Editor
Askov American

Askov, MN 55704




Dear Mr. Heiller:

I was very impressed and very moved by your July 16 column questioning the hero status of Lt. Col. Oliver North. I was so impressed by the concise, articulate way in which you exposed the real issue of North's performance and the Irangate hearings, that I shared your column with my colleagues in the House.

A copy of the Congressional Record from August 3 is enclosed.

I applaud your insight and your courage. All too many Americans have been duped into believing North was right when he broke the law, lied to Congress, and conducted his own foreign policy. It is good to read an editor who is not afraid to rant and rave on the behalf of the Constitution.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jim Oberstar






No comments:

Post a Comment